Quadrics Top in Top 500 and IDC Rating

Munich 02 December 2002 Analysing the Top500 under the perspective of high-end clusters, Quadrics ranks with 3 of the top 5 as the network of choice in high-end computing. These machines use Quadrics QsNet as the system area data network. The same is true with the IDC Balanced Rating Benchmark of Capability Computers from November 2002. Here 5 of the leading 15 systems use Quadrics QsNet, although IDC deleted the second machine of Los Alamos National Lab, as both are identical. (Uwe Harms)

The Top500 Supercomputer List

The November 2002 list shows three top computers within the first 5 sites using Quadrics QsNet as their system area network. Their combined Linpack performance, Rmax, sums up to 21 TFlop/s, the peak performance is nearly 33 TFlop/s. That means that these Quadrics systems reach a Linpack application performance of 65% of the peak. Within the Top10 this grows to 5 machines with a an aggregated Rmax of nearly 30 TFlop/s and a peak performance of 44 TFlop/s.

The fastest clusters, based on Hewlett-Packard Alpha processors, follow directly the NEC Earth Simulator and can be found on rank 2 and 3, the ASCI Q machines at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Their Rmax performance is 7.727 TFlop/s. Nr. 5 is an Intel Linux cluster based on Xeon 2.4 GHz with the Quadrics QsNet. Linux NetworX delivered it to Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Nr. 6 and 7 are based on Alphas, the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (Dual-Rail QsNet) and the French Atomic Authority (Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, CEA. Here the Rmax data are 4.5 and 4 TFlop/s respectively.

Hewlett-Packard delivered another two Itanium 2 based clusters with the Quadrics interconnect. The British Petroleum Houston, rank 42, and the Pacific Northwest Laboratory (Dual-Rail QsNet) on rank 61. Thus all the fast clusters use the high-speed Quadrics QsNet.

IDC Benchmark

IDC released their November 2002 Benchmark list. Here, because of its better processor and scaling rating, the IBM ASCI White lies ahead the Hewlett-Packard ASCI Q machine. In their table only one ASCI Q is listed, as they put only one of an identical machine in their ranking. Here the Pittsburgh and the CEA computer move forward to rank 4 and 5. Because of a lower processor rating the Linux NetworX machine fall back on rank 9. Thus IDC gives the same picture that Quadrics QsNet based clusters fall in the high-end category.


Uwe Harms

[News on Advanced IT]   [Calendar]   [Analysis]   [IT in Medicine]